Part of this is computer talk and I tried to keep it basic talk so no one's eyes started to glaze over after the second paragraph
I had the last two days off from work and basqued in air and sun of the lovely northern Michigan.
When I came back today, there was drama based on one incident that occurred while I was gone. I had locked down a user's rights to his business computer in order to help me troubleshoot what happens to the computer. He's one of the coworkers I'll go out to lunch with on a regular basis.
Anyway, one report is that while I was gone he tried to get his access reversed so that he had full rights to his computer. This source (who was one of my backups while gone, I'll call him BU) is known for blowing things out of proportion. BU came over and was going through the user accounts and BU2 (my second backup) got called him. BU2 updated BU on the new rights for everyone (right now its certain people).
Well Lunch Buddy, LB, had an opposite story. He said that he just called BU over because he wanted to save a file somewhere on his computer that was telling him he can't. He said that he just had a simple question that needed that didn't need drama. He also said that BU was telling LB never to me touch his computer or fix it because it took me 3 months to fix his computer (umm that's a completely different story and I have written information bugging him to make a decision for 3 months). anyhoo, LB went on saying that BU was complaining about all the software I had loaded and what crap it is and he doesn't understand why I made myself an administrator to the computer, etc etc.
BU2's story reflected that of BU's original story. BU2 said that LB was the one throwing a fit about not having access to his computer and how he was going to talk to his boss about it (who is my boss also).
Now what would you do? This is part of my dilemma being the only IT person on staff. There is no one else at my level that I can "be myself" with. I basicaly have to be nice to everyone and politically I can't accuse people of lying and such. Besides I'm the type of person that understands that there are 3 sides to every story, Person A's version, Person B's version and then the truth somewhere inbetween.
For personal ethics, I really have a problem with people that try to pull the hood over my head. I don't like people insisting that they're version is right. IMO I wasn't there so I really don't know who is right. Plus a part of me, even though likes going out to lunch with LB and some other people, lately I just don't want to. This is an example of why...I just don't like to play favorites or make people think that they'll get special treatment from me if I hang out with them (i.e. new computer, any gadget they want, etc).
So *phew* that was long winded, what would you do or what is your opinion?
I had the last two days off from work and basqued in air and sun of the lovely northern Michigan.
When I came back today, there was drama based on one incident that occurred while I was gone. I had locked down a user's rights to his business computer in order to help me troubleshoot what happens to the computer. He's one of the coworkers I'll go out to lunch with on a regular basis.
Anyway, one report is that while I was gone he tried to get his access reversed so that he had full rights to his computer. This source (who was one of my backups while gone, I'll call him BU) is known for blowing things out of proportion. BU came over and was going through the user accounts and BU2 (my second backup) got called him. BU2 updated BU on the new rights for everyone (right now its certain people).
Well Lunch Buddy, LB, had an opposite story. He said that he just called BU over because he wanted to save a file somewhere on his computer that was telling him he can't. He said that he just had a simple question that needed that didn't need drama. He also said that BU was telling LB never to me touch his computer or fix it because it took me 3 months to fix his computer (umm that's a completely different story and I have written information bugging him to make a decision for 3 months). anyhoo, LB went on saying that BU was complaining about all the software I had loaded and what crap it is and he doesn't understand why I made myself an administrator to the computer, etc etc.
BU2's story reflected that of BU's original story. BU2 said that LB was the one throwing a fit about not having access to his computer and how he was going to talk to his boss about it (who is my boss also).
Now what would you do? This is part of my dilemma being the only IT person on staff. There is no one else at my level that I can "be myself" with. I basicaly have to be nice to everyone and politically I can't accuse people of lying and such. Besides I'm the type of person that understands that there are 3 sides to every story, Person A's version, Person B's version and then the truth somewhere inbetween.
For personal ethics, I really have a problem with people that try to pull the hood over my head. I don't like people insisting that they're version is right. IMO I wasn't there so I really don't know who is right. Plus a part of me, even though likes going out to lunch with LB and some other people, lately I just don't want to. This is an example of why...I just don't like to play favorites or make people think that they'll get special treatment from me if I hang out with them (i.e. new computer, any gadget they want, etc).
So *phew* that was long winded, what would you do or what is your opinion?