No- even if money were not an option- i would not support the breeding of more and more animals when the shelters are already overflowing. If money were not an option- i would donate as much as possible to the shelter where i work and other wonderful shelters to expand facilities, make improvements, etcOriginally Posted by laureen227
but see, if money were no object, you could do both, 'cause you could have a great, big house to have as many kitties as you wanted!
I do see why good breeders can be important (and i mean that in the kindest way possible- not trying to step on toes)- to improve a breeds genetics, breed out certain defects, and overall improve that breeds quality/etc. (and yes, many REPUTABLE breeders (and we have some good ones on TCS!
BUT the problem i have is they are still breeding and as a result- it is contrinbuting to the overpopulation issues. (each animal a breeder breeds- means one more animal at a shelter that has no home to go to - the overcrowding issues are aweful and there is only soo much space a shelter has and only soo many foster homes available before tough decisions like pts have to be made.) Even though many kind breeders do help to rescue domestic cats/etc (and that is wonderful) it still does not help the overpopulation problem if they are breeding and putting more kitties out there and does not reduce the amounts of animals that are pts due to overpopulation/etc as a result of constant breeding. What is even worse are BYB who are not true breeders- yet just think that they can let their pets have babies and sell them.
I hope i didn't offend anyone- i ment that in the kindest way possible. But working at a shelter and seeing the results of overpopulation is heartbreaking. So for me- that is why i do not want to adopt from a breeder and would prefer to adopt a shelter/rescue animal.