I'm not sure which RC formula you're referring to, but I looked at Beauty+Fit against NB Ultra (original formula). The numbers (protein+fat) are almost the same. When it comes to fiber...The RC has an excessive amount IMO, 8.5%, while the NB seems more reasonable at 3%. I'll admit I'm sort of confused at the "correct" way to estimate carb content, but it seems if we leave the fiber out of the equation then the 2 foods are almost equal (using the inaccurate guar. analysis values). The fiber can't be coming from chicken.Originally Posted by kitytize
I would choose Royal Canin. Royal Canin foods are lower in carbs which tells me they actually have more meat than NB, even though they list more grains.
To be accurate you need the *as fed anaylsis* I do have that info for NB and NB carbs are 31% carbs I do not have *as fed* for RC Special 33 but even when I do the *guaranteed* it comes out to 26% carbs this is not accurate but shouldn't be way off. I have not checked Beauty & Fit. Special 33 is lower in carbs.Originally Posted by beandip
I'm not sure which RC formula you're referring to, but I looked at Beauty+Fit against NB Ultra (original formula).