I guess I need some help. I got a message today saying my sig was too big..which I think is strange because I copied the size of many other sigs. Maybe someone here can help me fix.. and understand how this is breaking forum rules? I'd appreciate it
-
Too many ads? Join our community of cat lovers now to reduce ads by 90%! Click here to join for free!
My sig
- Thread starter jenny1124
- Start Date
You must have got it fixed because I can see your sig just fine
I'm pretty sure the PM explained exactly why it was breaking forum rules.
The maximum file size for a signature is 30K and your signature is over 50K.
Here is a resized version that meets TCS rules.
The maximum file size for a signature is 30K and your signature is over 50K.
Here is a resized version that meets TCS rules.
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #4
Okay, it's been changed to that. Thank you for the help. I meant no offense in asking why it's breaking the rules.. I guess I just don't understand the size thing.. it looks exactly the same to me
It's my first time creating a signature, so I just copied someone else's and inserted the pictures I wanted and figured it was okay.
It's my first time creating a signature, so I just copied someone else's and inserted the pictures I wanted and figured it was okay.
It does look the same. The dimensions were fine.
Depending on what software you are using to make your sigs, this might help
http://www.freewebs.com/icklemiss21/savingsigs.htm
Depending on what software you are using to make your sigs, this might help
http://www.freewebs.com/icklemiss21/savingsigs.htm
Its okay, I did the same thing
It has something to do with the file size of the graphic. Even though the image size (dimensions) are the same, the size of a photo file can have a huge range - think mine started out at 60 and it needs to be under 30. I didn't understand the difference until some lovely mod pointed it out to me
It has to do with the images the Web produces. LOL that's about all I know
I believe the reason it is kept at a lower resolution is so that the pages load faster. I love your sig! Great tribute to the little Princess
It has something to do with the file size of the graphic. Even though the image size (dimensions) are the same, the size of a photo file can have a huge range - think mine started out at 60 and it needs to be under 30. I didn't understand the difference until some lovely mod pointed it out to me
It has to do with the images the Web produces. LOL that's about all I know
I believe the reason it is kept at a lower resolution is so that the pages load faster. I love your sig! Great tribute to the little Princess
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #7
That makes a little more senseOriginally Posted by Bonnie1965
Its okay, I did the same thing
It has something to do with the file size of the graphic. Even though the image size (dimensions) are the same, the size of a photo file can have a huge range - think mine started out at 60 and it needs to be under 30. I didn't understand the difference until some lovely mod pointed it out to me
It has to do with the images the Web produces. LOL that's about all I know
I believe the reason it is kept at a lower resolution is so that the pages load faster. I love your sig! Great tribute to the little Princess
Thank you for the compliment on the sig! I love my girl, only the best for her!
Latest Posts
-
-
-
-
-
A kitten fell down my chimney and I need advice!- Latest: Caspers Human