Originally Posted by adymarie
I mean - wouldn't you get a 2nd opinion before going this crazy.
well on the news report I saw about this - he was showing the camera letters he had from the consultant explaining his conditions and how long he had left etc....he had also seen scan results showing the so-called tumor and that he had more than one visit to the hospital about this condition.
I don't think the thought of a 2nd opinion even came into his mind
why would it, surely he should be able to trust the people that have diagnosed his condition, jeese they didn't say he had a bad tooth.
What would I do, well heck I haven't got a clue, I know I'd be pleased to hear it was a wrong diagnosis, but I'd be mad as hell, it wouldn't matter if you'd spent money or not, that poor man must have been through some tough times - fancy thinking you had cancer for 2 YEARS - how do you think that worked out for him, spending spree or not
Can I also ask what you mean byThe British perspective is interesting as well
is there something in the newspaper article you could point out for us or comment on ?