I think vaccines are needed but just like in our "lesser" animals we should look at if they are needed as much as we give them...
post #31 of 49
12/22/06 at 7:38pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
The mercury is contained in a preservative formerly used in many vaccines, Thimerasol. ...
Laurie |
|
I feel that vaccines are worth the risk. HOWEVER, I have a brain-damaged 26 yo. daughter who suffered because of the old DPT shot. At the time that she was given the vaccine in 1981, it had been outlawed in England, France and Japan; the safer vaccine was readily available, but Lederle laboratories owned the patent here in the U.S. and didn't market it because the profit margin was lower (it's the DtP that is used today) . After the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act was passed by Sen. Ted Kennedy & crew, the DPT vaccine was banned in the U.S.; there was a class action lawsuit filed, but the average out-of-pocket cost to successful families was over $40K, so most of the suits, including mine, were dismissed with prejudice.
One of my closest friends is the youngest person in the U.S. to have suffered Post Polio Syndrome caused by the polio vaccine that she was given in the 1960s. She has been in a wheel chair and/or using a walker since we were in our late 30s. So I know first hand that vaccine injuries can devastate a family, not just one life, but an entire FAMILY for a lifetime, yet I have whole-heartedly supported the vaccinations of my grandsons. An important note - my daughter had severe swelling of her vaccination site after the 2nd shot. A "lowly" nurse-practitioner told me that my daughter prob. had an allergy to horse serum and not to get her any more shots. I delayed the 3rd shot - I asked 2 expert pediatricians, who both reassured me that the odds were so great that if I thought my daughter would get a bad reaction to the 3rd shot, I should go buy a lottery ticket. I should've bought the ticket Instead, I feel like a drunk driver who has injured a child The decision was mine, it was wrong, and the culpability is mine - I ruined my child's life. But the warning was there - I just chose to ignore my mother's instincts, and the advice of others because I mistakenly thought that the opinion of someone with a "better" degree meant more. |
|
I hope you find peace with your self and stop taking the blame for some thing you did that could have been done differently, you didn't know it was going to happen, it's not your fault at all.
|

|
The drug companies are big and powerful, and IMO, our government (CDC) needs to protect us at ALL COSTS!! These are OUR CHILDREN!!!
|
I couldn't agree with you more sweetie!
|
Here are my two cents:
she went from that child to a little girl who was just mentally handicapped, for lack of a better word. If I remember correctly, her speech went away, her abilities went downhill... Was it the vaccination? I guess we'll never know... I wanted to get that vaccination for cervical cancer but the fact that it requires 3 doses is something that doesn't fit into my work schedule... I'll have to try to get it over the summer before I get too old (oh my word)! That and I want to hear more about it - you know how medical things go - first it's good for you, then a new study comes out and oops, sorry, can have these harmful effects... |
You are definitely describing my daughter 



At only 17 years [she can't even respond in this thread due to her young age
] she is considering a far-too-overlooked topic. I am so impressed - with young people such as these, we elders can know that we are leaving the world in good hands 

), I'm totally for vaccinating children and myself. The only reason these diseases aren't a huge problem in the US now is because the vaccines have prevented so many infections.
|
For the most part, I'm pro-vaccine. My grandmother had polio and I was told stories of what she went through to recover... no thank you.
But personally, I won't be getting the cervical cancer vaccine. If you read the published medical journals on this it says that in the testing the women who got the vaccine still showed pre-cancerous lesions (found during pap tests) from other versions of the virus. "Twenty-two women receiving the vaccine did develop cervical abnormalities that can lead to cancer but these precancerous lesions were not associated with HPV-16." "This study, like previous studies of HPV vaccines, did not directly show that vaccination reduces the occurrence of cervical cancer. Such a study would take between 10 and 20 years to complete and would be unethical, explains John T. Schiller, Ph.D., of the National Cancer Institute’s Center for Cancer Research. " But this unproven vaccine with unknown side effects is being pushed on me by my obgyn because you can only get it until the day of your 27th birthday... which would mean I would need the first shot in the series, like, today. Luckily, one of the companies who have created this vaccine is retesting it for women up to 45 and plan to resubmit their findings in order to gain approval. I think I'll wait and let them run more tests before I randomly drug myself with something we don't yet know the effects of. IMO, I'd rather have pap tests more often instead of taking a vaccine only to find out in 10 years that it causes birth defects or brain damage or something else horrendus. I'll take it when the studies prove it's safe and effective. |
|
Wow, very enlightening post, thank you. I don't think I would get it either.
(I'm to old anyway, LOL) And what is their reason for only giving it until your 27th birthday, I would very interested to know. I would not want to be any doctor' gueni pig (sp). I'm glad you are not letting your Doctor push you into it. |

|
Here's a link provided by the U.S. gov. National Vaccine Injury Prevention:
http://www.909shot.com/.... |
