http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061212/...emeanor_meow_1
I thought this was funny until I read this:
"I'm just glad he at least reprimanded him," she said. "He used to be a good boy. It has done emotional harm to me. ... I was the one who was tortured." "Emotional harm"!?!? "Tortured"?!?! What a joke and a huge waste of the courts time! People will sue for anything these days. Those hecklers were suing "Kramer" for causing 'emotional harm' as well. Just today Evel Knievel stated he was suing Kanye West for his video that "damages Knievels image"... This is legalized extortion!
Granted, Michael Richards was dead wrong for what he did and Kanye West is a spoiled brat who can't accept that just because his video cost tons of money and had hot girls and cool special effects (other than Pam Andersons boobs) doesn't mean its good! But what makes anyone think it gives them the right to punish someone else because they were personally offended? Are we gonna sue every jerk who flips us off in the parking lot? What about people who wear clothes that we think should be in Glamours 'Blackbar' list? Or what if someone is wearing your signature hairstyle? Should you have a right to sue? *sigh* Whats the world coming to???
Link to Evel Knievel article:
http://entertainment.tv.yahoo.com/en...599248000.html
I thought this was funny until I read this:
"I'm just glad he at least reprimanded him," she said. "He used to be a good boy. It has done emotional harm to me. ... I was the one who was tortured." "Emotional harm"!?!? "Tortured"?!?! What a joke and a huge waste of the courts time! People will sue for anything these days. Those hecklers were suing "Kramer" for causing 'emotional harm' as well. Just today Evel Knievel stated he was suing Kanye West for his video that "damages Knievels image"... This is legalized extortion!
Granted, Michael Richards was dead wrong for what he did and Kanye West is a spoiled brat who can't accept that just because his video cost tons of money and had hot girls and cool special effects (other than Pam Andersons boobs) doesn't mean its good! But what makes anyone think it gives them the right to punish someone else because they were personally offended? Are we gonna sue every jerk who flips us off in the parking lot? What about people who wear clothes that we think should be in Glamours 'Blackbar' list? Or what if someone is wearing your signature hairstyle? Should you have a right to sue? *sigh* Whats the world coming to???
Link to Evel Knievel article:
http://entertainment.tv.yahoo.com/en...599248000.html


hands on me again I would rip his arm out at the 






I have more sympathy for the Evel copyright infringement case, at least his has some legal standing!
IMO, the mother should be ashamed of herself for allowing her son's cat to be kicked out of the family! So mom is irate at the judge for not dismissing this in August; sounds like misplaced guilt to me---she should have worked harder to solve the problem, like maybe keep the cat inside