. . . .I knew it was in the banner, of course; and it was such a relief to see something in an inter-net banner that wasn't tacky! It sure added a touch of class, in my opinion.
So, if it can't be in the banner, can't it at least have some front-page space? It's surely worth it, I would think; at least as much as Emazing (if you know what I mean).
I don't think advertisers have a clue what they're pushing, anyway. It's all this "click through" mania, with no view as to the worth of what's being "clicked through"
to. I've only "clicked through" to one advert on the inter-net: the one that was here and is now gone.
Who are the people who "click through" inter-net banner or pop-up ads anyway? I surely don't, nor can I imagine ever doing so, because they're all so
tacky. I pay good money for inter-net access and I'm interested in information, not hype.
It's unfair for advertisers to want more than the exposure banner placement gives them. I suppose those same advertisers would want people to pull over to the side of the highway and "click through" the billboards! Greed, greed, greed!

=^..^=